Difference between revisions of "Talk:Firmware history"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Isn't it convention to order release notes in reverse-order so that the most current changes are the first thing you see? If we did that here, it might make it easier for users to quickly...) |
Javajunkie (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Firmware History moved to Talk:Firmware history: naming convention) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:17, 8 June 2007
Isn't it convention to order release notes in reverse-order so that the most current changes are the first thing you see? If we did that here, it might make it easier for users to quickly determine if they want/need to upgrade. - Scarr