|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | | | |
| | ==Profiling== | | ==Profiling== |
| − | Adding profiling technology to the Axe-Fx II is on the roadmap.
| + | ... |
| − | | |
| − | Cliff: "This will be the best of both worlds IMO. There are advantages/disadvantages to both techniques: The disadvantage to modeling is that the model is only as good as the cabinet IR and many people have no idea what cabinet to use with a model. There's also the issue of speaker interaction. Since the speaker is unknown, the interaction is an educated guess. If you want an exact replica of the amp/cab combination some adjustment of the speaker resonance parameters is required and many people aren't comfortable with those adjustments. The disadvantage to profiling is you only get the amp at one setting. Also, the tone controls, etc. are not accurate and you have no idea where they were set when the profile was created. After using both I still prefer modeling and can get better tones with modeling. For the plug-n-play types, profiling may be preferable." [http://forum.fractalaudio.com/lounge/46841-axe-fx-ii-kemper-processor-discussion-14.html#post618423 Source]
| |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:About_the_Axe-Fx_II]] | | [[Category:About_the_Axe-Fx_II]] |
| | [[category:Presets and effects]] | | [[category:Presets and effects]] |
Revision as of 10:45, 17 February 2012
